The Fault in Our Stars
is an extremely popular book amongst teens. During the time I was contract
teaching, the book had made several rounds of the different classes I teach,
and is often quoted atop the faded sepia photographs my students post on
Instagram and Tumblr. Having read the novel, I see why it appeals to them:
mopey teens completely and utterly in love with each other, though with a
sinister “til-death-do-us-part” hanging over them. The protagonists both have
cancer, and help each other through their struggles. However, I did not
particularly enjoy the book even though I had set out with the intention to.
John Green’s writing, I feel, is far too presumptuous and cloying, as though he
had set out to (and in fact has succeeded in) have legions of teenagers quoting
single lines of his stuff on social media. Furthermore, the events that unfold
in the story are simply unrealistic, like a perfect soap opera. Even though it
deals with issues of love, illness, and death, they are not dealt with
completely satisfactorily, and the illnesses only serve to put pressure on the
love relationship. That is why I would not recommend this book for study in a
literature classroom.
The MOE recommended text I have chosen is The Boy in the Striped Pyjamas. I taught
this novel to my three Secondary One Literature classes during my contract
teaching. It is a simple enough read, even the lower-achieving students had no
trouble reading through it and understanding the plot. It still was a challenge
to get them to read deeply enough to understand the themes. The story is told
mostly from the point of view of Bruno, a nine-year-old boy who makes friends
with a Jewish boy his age, across the fence of a concentration camp near his
home. I really enjoyed the movie that was adapted from this novel as I had a
good, cathartic cry at the ending. I would have to say that it did take quite
some effort on my part to make the issues and themes explored in the book
relevant to my mostly Singaporean students who did not have much prior knowledge
of the second World War, but I thought it made a good introduction for them to
what some of the effects of the War were on a micro-level. Although I
personally disliked the overly simplistic language that John Boyne used to
designate the thoughts as coming from a nine-year-old, it was very moving and
deals sharply with different perspectives that were taken by the various groups
of people who were directly involved in the War. This book does serve one of
the most important aims of Literature study: to tune students to an awareness
of the Other, so I would recommend this text for lower achieving students, but
push high achieving students to study texts that have more depth in the
language.
A book I may not typically read is Fasting, Feasting, but once I started reading it, I could not put
it down. I enjoyed reading through the perspective of an unmarriageable Indian
woman, whom Anita Desai crafted very vividly. Uma is an unwed, quirky, but kind
woman who lives with her parents, and her brother Arun is lonely in America
where he attends university. The story sensitized me to life as a woman other
than that of my own privileged circumstances as an educated Singaporean. This
is definitely a book appropriate for O level Literature students to read, with
plenty to learn not just about gender roles, but also race in the second part
of the book.
Thanks Jayne for sharing about teaching The Boy in the Striped Pyjamas. I suppose we will have our personal preferences for texts, and we don't always get to teach what we like, though we can always teach something with a text chosen.
ReplyDelete